Swordfish in showbusiness

5 min read

Deviation Actions

Rahiden's avatar
By
Published:
3K Views


Well, look at that – I got a second Daily Deviation! Can't complain about the free publicity, hm? It just so happens that I was already thinking of writing an art-related blog post, so I figured that now would be as good an opportunity as ever.

I was talking to Sir-Iggs some time ago about MOCers' personalities, and how it affects their popularity. I know that we should view artwork and artists' personalities as two entirely independent things, but I've experienced MOCers with (for lack of a better word) repulsive dispositions receiving less positive feedback than their creations would otherwise suggest.

Perhaps it's a question of context. After all, if you know the considerations and effort that went into the construction of a MOC, surely you can then appreciate it more as a work of art?

In fact, RattrapsTail described me as being one of the most personal MOCers that he knows: "Because one can get to know a fair bit about your train of thought by merely reading your journals". It was a strange realisation, but I certainly see where he's coming from, given how openly I write most of these blogs and how enthusiastically I participate in the deviantArt MOCing community. Most importantly, I feel like many of you know and understand me as a person.

On the other side of the spectrum is retinence, who, I think it's fair to say, is rather more reserved. He's a perfectly respectable builder, of course, and one whom I admire. Come to think of it, he and I are the only two MOCers with two Daily Deviations apiece. And yet, I wonder how many people on deviantArt can claim to know him. Perhaps it's intentional; only after dissociating oneself from the artwork can the artwork be judged solely on its own merits.

This makes me think of a documentary I watched about technologies that have been introduced over the years, and their inventors. One argument they made was that the success was not necessarily held by the one who discovered the phenomenon, or even the one with the more effective product; it was the person who sold the idea, the one with social skills, who received the fame. As with anything that's in the public eye, it's all about showbusiness.

I feel like I'm struggling to make my point (partly because I don't really have one). My question for you, humble reader, is this: let's say that I never wrote any journals. Let's say that my Artist's Comments were minimal, and that I presented each MOC individually in silence. Or, heaven forbid, let's say that Hero Faffory did not exist, nor any other non-MOC deviation for that matter. How would your opinion of me change, if at all?

Ah, it feels good to write a short blog post once in a while. Thanks for reading.

Skin by Nesmaty

© 2013 - 2024 Rahiden
Comments35
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Shadow-Architect's avatar
This is a good one. :)

From a purely psychometric perspective, art is a person's expression regarding their experience, perception and maniulation of reality. If a person's art is unique, this is recognised and thus their view of the world can be held as "special". Like the person with Asperger's syndrome, they see patterns in the world that no-one/few others see and link them together in art.

So, I ask myself, what's the difference between this perception and their personality?

First, let me establish a divide. There is a difference between what is established here - on a website, where communication is a stipulated action - and a neutral environment; an art gallery, for instance. Here, I can interact with artists and actually get to know them; vice versa. In an art gallery ("neutral environment"), I can't do that, either because the artists in question are dead or on the other side of the planet (both, in some cases). In an art gallery, I am forced to judge a person according to their art - rathermore, the expression of their perception of reality. Any link between their art and their personality never exists in the first place.

Here, on dA, a link between perception and personality is draw - and I am unsure if it rightfully so. A communicative, articulate and, above all, likeable person such as yourself can only contribute to the reception your art gets by, uh, blogging. I can see the art and the person - and if the person is essentially an arsehole then I am liable to wonder if they deserve the attention their art lends them; if they're a wonderful, intelligent person then I am inclined to appreciate their art more and say so.

In some respects, what a person communicates often involves their perception of the world. Which is interesting. If Person A any different from their e.g arseholey nature, would their art be the same?

It's only a new development in the past decade or so that has allowed artists to "meet" each other the world over via the internet. Popularity is gained - and lost - far more easily than when good artists had to wait long periods of time for their art to circulate and gain value amongst the art community.

I can quite definitively say: if you didn't post those little (xD) journals of yours I would have lost interest in your work some time ago.

TEXT WALLLLLLLLL